QDMA Articles :
October's Balance
By: Dave Guynn - Clemson University
As an enthusiastic hunter, I know
well what it can mean to see and harvest a quality white-tailed
buck. Being intimate with Lady Luck is often the determining factor,
but hard work and sheer persistence are needed to consistently
take good bucks. As I mature, the importance of taking such bucks
has lessened, while the assurance of their presence has become
paramount. My experience as a wildlife biologist has made me aware
of the importance of proper harvest management. And proper herd
management cannot be achieved under today's norms of shooting
the first legal animal encountered or by shooting only quality
bucks.
Harvest guidelines are our most important
deer management tool. As such, regulations should spell out not
just the number of animals to be harvested in an area, but the
social classes (age and sex) of those animals as well. In formulating
these regulations, we should ask if a given deer population is
living well or is it suffering social misery due to imbalances
in herd structure? What classes of animals should be harvested
if such an imbalance exists?
Why should we concern ourselves with
maintaining a natural social balance in a managed deer herd? Because,
to survive as long as they have, deer long ago developed social
rules or mechanisms that would keep deer herds and their individual
members fit and competitive. However, when harvest regulations
allow hunters to deplete certain social classes (with deer, this
is usually most or all bucks 1.5 years old or older) in an unscientific,
haphazard manner, the herd's social mechanisms can become stressed.
This is exactly the fix we are in today. We can only guess at
how many whitetails inhabited North American before the white
man arrived, but the late Ernest Thompson Seton, a pioneer naturalist
and author, estimated a population of about 40 million animals.
We would surmise that, despite predation and hunting by Native
Americans, bucks 4.5 years old and older were not uncommon. The
adult sex ratio of such herds was probably in the range of 50-75
bucks per 100 does. In local areas, the rut and fawning seasons
probably lasted six to eight weeks. These were healthy deer living
in social balance.
The situation is much different today.
Post-hunt adult sex ratios of 20 or less bucks per 100 does are
the rules, and most of these bucks are 1.5 years old. Mature bucks,
4.5 years old or older, are rare and many hunters cannot even
comprehend how a mature buck from their area would look. Thus,
at the beginning of the rut, 80% or more of the antlered bucks
are 1.5 years old. These youngsters rise to the occasion and most
receptive does are eventually bred, but at a price. How do the
demands of breeding inhibit the growth potential of those few
bucks that survive the hunting season? Because of the social imbalance,
the rut and fawning periods may last 15 weeks or longer. This
places additional stress on the few surviving bucks and causes
fawns to be born after the period of optimum nutrition during
spring or summer.
In most situations, this predicament
is the result of haphazard hunting regulations and practices that
have been defined more by tradition than biological concerns.
In many areas, doe harvests are inadequate while bucks are harvested
at such high rates that 80% or more of the bucks taken are 1.5
years old or younger. Also, most bucks are harvested within the
first few days of the season.
The root of this problem is within
us, the deer hunters. Why must we take the first legal animal
we see? Hunting is a personal experience that is enjoyed in solitude
or with people we know. It should not be a competitive sport with
the objective of seeing who can shoot the biggest or the most
deer. Why not go afield to observe, enjoy, learn deer behavior
and harvest those individual animals that will create the proper
social balance and ensure the continued welfare of the population?
We must learn to respect the long-term welfare of our deer resource
and place our personal desires behind t
he needs of the resource.
In recent years I have become a strong
proponent of the quality deer management philosophy. My hope is
that men and women who are fortunate enough to have known a deer
herd in social balance will value these experiences to the point
that socially imbalanced herds are unacceptable from both recreational
and ethical viewpoints. Informed and selfless individuals must
be willing to support biologically sound management principles
that may in the short term be counter to his or her personal desires,
but which in the long term will strengthen the resource.
The primary characteristic of any
social system is the ranking of its members. Antler and body size
are the primary factors that determine the relative rank of each
buck. During the weeks preceding the rut, bucks establish their
social pecking order. This they accomplish primarily by posturing,
sparring, and signpost behavior.
In a balanced population, mature bucks
will do most of the breeding. The presence of older bucks and
their signposts may suppress the competitiveness and libido of
younger bucks. Lower testosterone levels should result in decreased
weight loss during the rut and allow young bucks to grow to greater
size before they assume breeding duties.
Under these conditions, the rut is
intense and relatively brief. From the viewpoint of the hunter
or deer observer, October will be a most exciting time. To experience
the full drama of deer behavior, deer can be attracted by rattling
antlers or mimicking the grunting of a rutting buck.
Beyond October, deer herds can exist
in the social balance for which they evolved. But it will not
be easy. To achieve this goal will require harvest management
practices more scientific, flexible and progressive than those
currently in use - practices that may never be accepted without
the encouragement and support of selfless, farsighted hunters.
These hunters must look not only beyond October, but beyond themselves.
Their ultimate satisfaction must not come from how many deer or
how large the antlers taken, but from knowing that the welfare
of the deer resource is of their making.
Once established, such socially balanced
herds will have high rates of reproduction and fawn survival.
Long and generous hunting seasons will be required to harvest
the various classes of deer that need to be removed to keep the
herd size and social makeup in balance. But, first, the general
ranks of hunters must be educated as to their role in deer management.
Otherwise, changes in regulations regarding season length and
bag limits would be to no avail.
Dr. Dave Guynn is a professor in the
Department of Forestry, Clemson University. He also serves on
the QDMA's Executive Board.
Back
to deer biology and management